YOU MUST
GO BACK
The first
story perhaps the whole world knows about now. A National Geographic
photographer, Steve McCurry, had to go back to Pakistan to look for the young
woman he caught on camera in 1984, just one child among several he photographed
in the school tent at a refugee camp. What captivated him, when he saw his
finished pictures, were her enormous sea-green eyes, in a land where eyes are
so brown, they look black. A portrait that “sears the heart,” her picture ran
on the cover of the June 1985 National Geographic.
McCurry went back and found the
girl, now a married woman and the mother of three children, but with the same
“haunted and haunting” eyes. These eyes haunted McCurry for seventeen years.
Many people
might think this silly, a waste of time and energy. But I understand the man
and applaud his efforts. In addition to intriguing people like me, it made a
good story for National Geographic and for television. One might say, if
you could use a little excitement in your life, go back somewhere to finish a
dream or a story, but not back home. Home would be too subjective a
destination; you need to be objective about this.
The second story appeared as an
episode during an escape on foot over the Pyrenees
Mountains during World War II, before America got
into it. In Yours Is the Earth, Margaret Vail, an American married into
the French upper crust, stays in France as long as she dares, to be
as close as possible to her husband, Robert, in a German prison camp. She waits
so long to leave France that
her only way to escape is to travel on foot with her four-year-old daughter
Rose-Hélène, across the Pyrenees Mountains into Spain , in a group of eight, with a
guide.
When they rest for the night in the
house of strangers, sitting by the fire and listening to their hosts and each
other talk, after Rose-Hélène is asleep, Margaret hears the lady of the house
say the young man who appears not so intelligent is smart. “He has read that
book over there,” she says. Margaret Vail wants to get out of her chair and see
what the book’s title is but she is too tired to make the effort. She leaves
the house the next morning, before day and without learning what the title is.
Margaret Vail determines at that point she will return someday to that house in thePyrenees
to thank the people there more thoroughly for their kindness and help. She also
wants to find out the title of that book.
Margaret Vail determines at that point she will return someday to that house in the
When I read this, perhaps
ten years after Vail wrote it, I too wanted to know the title of that book.
This wish nagged me so, I finally wrote to the author, in care of her
publisher, to ask her the title. That began a most pleasant period of correspondence
with an American lady in France ,
who had her husband back from the war, but who lived in a huge ancestral house
on vast lands where everyone spoke French and some working on the estate could
not even read their own language. Robert knew English because of his private
schooling and Rose-Hélène grew up speaking both French and English equally
well. Yet Vail was lonely for communication with a native of her own language.
In her first letter to me she said she had not returned to the house in the
mountains, and still didn’t know the title of the book, but she was still
planning to make that return journey, with Robert.
I’m sure she never did. If she had,
during the years we wrote to each other, she would have told me. We
corresponded until one day her light blue, dark-blue-lined envelope with family
crest arrived with only an almost incomprehensible bit of scratch saying she’d
had a stroke and could no longer write. I doubt she was able to make such a
trip after that.
I did not have to travel to go
back, for my return would have been entirely through Margaret Vail. I merely
wrote to ask her if she had gone back. But I believe my need to know the
book’s title was as great as hers. Her never satisfying her desire to know has
not put closure to my frustration.
Perhaps all three of us presented
here were unreasonable but I’ve never heard reason is a prerequisite for what
writers do. Margaret Vail was a journalist before her marriage. The
photographer’s job must be akin to writing. All three of us merely followed
some drummer others didn’t hear. What did it do for us?
Only one of us three truly went
back. Photographer McCurry was bound to have experienced some disappointment,
possibly enough to shatter a dream he was happier with than he was with the
reality. But if it was only all in a day’s work, he was successful and may live
happily ever after.
Margaret Vail could have forgotten
all about her anticipated going back when her illness struck. And yet, in the
strange ways of the human mind, going back to that cabin in the mountains to
learn the title of a book might have been the very thing that stayed with her,
while she forgot everything else. Who can know what goes on in the brain of a
stroke victim?
As for me, I have
remained frustrated over not knowing that book’s title. I will probably never
be normal again—if I ever was—until I write this story as fiction in a
geography I know, not an escape from Hitler, but from something else. The most
exciting aspect of such a story for me will be choosing a title for the elusive
book
We must go back—not to experience
full memories that can be merely recalled and, if your brain is alive and well,
fall short of joy and cause useless nostalgia—but go back only for the memory
that never was finished and needs to be. If such an unfinished memory should
actually be “back home,” go back just for it and avoid all roads that would
lead to nostalgia. When we do that, we are still looking to the future, for we
seek knowledge of the unknown, one constant attribute of a true writer. It
helps to keep you young, to boot.
No comments:
Post a Comment