UPDATE ON WAR
AND PEACE
If my memory serves me right,
Anne Morrow Lindbergh enjoyed reading War and Peace so avidly that she
found herself indulging in this pleasure even in the morning, whereas she
ordinarily reserved the evening for such. Perhaps I just haven’t got to that
addictive part of the story but I suspect I will, but without free time for
reading it. It has taken me this long (how long?) to get through the first two
books of the 15, but that is enough for drawing certain conclusions.
Plot and setting are not
important aspects of this novel by Count Leo Tolstoy. In fact, they hardly
count at all for this story. He seems to stress something about life, anyone’s,
almost as if one was born for the purpose of dying, a continuation of life that
goes on eternally. Book 2 sees several deaths on the battlefield in this
Napoleonic war of 1805, but not drawn with emotional fervor, nor with even
realistic detail. In modern parlance he is telling, not showing. We see
officers and even royalty discussing what’s happening, and we anticipate some
action based on our understanding of what war is like garnered from other sources. Then the battle is over without much of a show but Frenchmen and Russians lie dead. It seems as if the author is a bystander purporting to be a
reporter. At times he says “we” and “our” as if he, Tolstoy, is there in
person. He may see himself in the character Prince Andrew who is an entity as contrasted to others involved. He rides up on his horse alone to look over the venue for the next battle. After the cessation of firing, he returns, checks the outcome and then pronounces it satisfactory or not. It seems His Excellency is infallible and always right. In the author's mind, is the Prince really Tolstoy who was only a Count in real life?